21. Creinin Yards D, Keverline S, Meyn L An effective. How regular is typical? An analysis off period frequency. Contraceptive. 2004; 70 :289–292. [PubMed] [Yahoo Pupil]
twenty two. Geirsson R T, Busby-Earle Roentgen Meters. Specific dates may well not provide a reliable imagine off gestational ages. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991; 98 :108–109. [PubMed] [Google Beginner]
23. Waller D K, Spears W D, Gu Y. et al. Evaluating amount-specific error about bear in mind out-of start of past cycle. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2000; 14 :262–267. [PubMed] [Bing Pupil]
24. Haarburger D, Pillay T S. Historical perspectives inside symptomatic medical pathology: growth of the brand new maternity attempt. J Clin Pathol. 2011; 64 :546–548. [PubMed] [Bing Beginner]
twenty-six. Scolaro K l, Braxton-Lloyd K, Helms K-l. Equipment to possess domestic review regarding women?s health issues. Are J Fitness Syst Pharm. 2008; 65 :299–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
twenty-seven. Johnson S r, Godbert S, Perry P. et al. Precision of a property-situated tool to possess giving an early on estimate of pregnancy stage compared with reference measures. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100 :1635–1641. [PubMed] [Bing College student]
29. Mustafa G, David R Jparative precision out of health-related estimate in place of menstrual gestational ages in automated birth permits. Social Wellness Rep. 2001; 116 :15–21. [PMC 100 % free blog post] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Johnson S, Godbert Sparison away from family pregnancy decide to try which have months estimator and you may ultrasound crown rump measurement in order to assume birth go out. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100 (step 3 Suppl.):S330. [Bing Beginner]